Energy policy
It has been long-standing policy that energy should
be both low-cost and reliable. After all, energy is the lifeblood
of our economy. Energy is an input into every good
or service.
Unfortunately, in 2007, the North Carolina legislature
passed legislation, Senate Bill 3 (SB3), that would
knowingly drive up electricity prices. The bill mandated
that utility companies purchase 7.5 percent of their electricity
from renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind
power. The extra costs, not surprisingly, are passed on to
customers.
Key Facts
- Under SB3, utility companies can meet 40 percent
of the renewable energy mandate by buying electricity
from outside the state, even though the electricity
never comes back to North Carolina. In other words,
North Carolinians pay extra for electricity to subsidize
the electricity produced and delivered in states like
Texas and California.
- "Renewable energy" is an arbitrary term with an
arbitrary meaning. The obvious point of SB3 is to
reduce carbon dioxide (CO2); however, the definition
of "renewable energy" includes neither nuclear energy
nor even most hydropower.
- The "allowable" energy sources are filled with significant
problems, not least of which is the high cost of
wind, solar, and biomass (see the graph below).
- North Carolina has poor wind resources. The only
feasible locations for wind power in this state would
be in the mountains or along the coast.
- Some environmental extremists want to create for
wind power a special exception to the state's Ridge
Law, which prohibits the construction of tall structures
along the mountain ridgelines. The law would
still prohibit modest privately funded buildings that
would create jobs and help the economy, but electricity
customers would be forced to pay for the placement
of costly, unreliable, and massive (500 feet tall)
industrial wind turbines along mountain ridgelines.
- If offshore wind turbines were constructed, not only
would the massive structures be visible from the coast,
but also customers would have to pay an excessive
amount for electricity (much more even in comparison
with the costs of onshore wind power).
- Wind power is intermittent and unreliable because
the wind does not blow all the time. As a result, wind
is not a source for baseload generation (the electricity
generation needed for ongoing demand). Also, since
wind cannot blow on cue, it is not a means for meeting
peak demand.
Recommendation
- Repeal SB3. A bill that artificially creates higher
electricity prices hurts the economy and hurts families.
Those who suffer the most are the poor. Individuals
with lower incomes spend a greater share of their
personal budgets on energy compared with groups at
higher income levels. SB3 drives up electricity prices,
creates a less reliable electricity system, and has no
benefits.
If renewable energy sources, such as wind, solar,
and biomass, were viable low-cost options, then utility
companies would use them. Instead, these energy
sources are so inadequate that the legislature had to
pass a bill to force people to buy renewable energy.
SB3 primarily serves as a way to mandate a
guaranteed market for renewable energy providers,
because otherwise people would avoid their cost-prohibitive
and unreliable electricity.
Analyst: Daren Bakst, J.D., LL.M.
Director of Legal and Regulatory Studies
919-828-3876 • dbakst@johnlocke.org