Highways and interstates

The "good roads" state is quickly turning into the "traffic congestion" state. While North Carolina ranks third among the 50 states in the amount of money spent per mile of roads, it seems that the money is not spent well. Our rural and urban interstates are poorly maintained and congested (see Figure 1 below).

One reason for the deterioration of the state's roads is that the General Assembly has not dedicated all highway-related revenues to highway construction and maintenance. Since 1990, a total of nearly $4 billion in proceeds from gas and car taxes have been spent on transit or General Fund programs (see Figure 2 below). While most of this transfer was originally intended to offset tax changes in the 1989 transportation bill, it is long past time that all gas and car taxes be dedicated to highway investment.

The legislature has ignored the politicized decision-making process at the Board of Transportation, which continues to misallocate road building funds based on political logrolling, not documented transportation needs.

The General Assembly continues to allow the overfunding of public transit at the expense of roads. These failures have all contributed to a deteriorating road system. The legislature must restore public confidence by spending highway user fees on highways, not on politicians' pet projects.

Key points

  • While North Carolina's highway system ranks 20th of 50 states in overall performance, it ranks 46th in urban interstate congestion (Figure 1 below).
  • The state's low urban interstate congestion ranking is the worst among its competitor states in the Southeast (Figure 3 below).
  • Of 17 municipal public transit systems in N.C., only five carry more than 1 percent of the commuters, and only three carry more than 2 percent.
  • Nevertheless, those systems receive a disproportionate share of the transportation funds. Public transit's share of transportation funds in Charlotte is 57.5%; in Raleigh, 27.5%; and in Durham, 50.7% (Figure 5 below).
  • The state's highway needs are estimated at $50 billion to $70 billion over 25 years.
  • North Carolina's gasoline tax of 30.2 cents per gallon is the second highest in the Southeast (behind only Florida's) and the 16th highest among the 50 states. It is nearly 10 cents higher than those of five other Southeastern states (Figure 4).
  • Since 1990 the General Assembly has ignored the dismal road conditions and diverted about $4 billion from the Highway Trust Fund to the General Fund (Figure 2).
  • Spending $8.2 billion in federal, state and local funds on rail transit in the Triangle that will carry only about one percent of the traveling public is a poor investment (see the "Public Transit" section).

Recommendations

  1. Stop transferring funds from the Highway Trust Fund to the General Fund. Ending the transfer would add hundreds of millions of dollars a year to the state's investment in highway construction and maintenance.
  2. Change the state's highway formulas that currently favor sparsely populated rural areas so that they provide relief to the congestion-plagued cities. In other words, highway funds should be distributed based on documented transportation needs, not political horse-trading.
  3. Restructure the Department of Transportation by reducing and merging departments.
  4. Increase the use of competitive contracting for design and planning functions.
  5. Downsize the Board of Transportation and make it an advisory panel only.
  6. End the disproportionate funding of mass transit. Transportation funding should be based on the way people actually travel, not on transit planners' attempts to use transit to reshape cities.
  7. End state funding of rail systems in the Triangle and the Triad and repeal local-option sales tax authorization for rail transit (see the previous section on "Public Transit" for more details).


Analyst: Dr. Michael Sanera
Director of Research and Local Government Studies
919-828-3876 • msanera@johnlocke.org

Who Is John Locke