From George Washington University:
The paper asked “whether you should or shouldn’t shave pubic hair,” Schaffer said. “Think in terms of if you were to put your mouth on someone’s genitals. Would you want it to be shaved? Is a little topiary work appropriate?”
As I wrote in 2003 for a Carolina Journal Issues in Higher Education feature:
In sexuality studies, however, gratuitous offensiveness is regarded as necessary to teach the class ? because sexuality studies aren’t about instruction, they’re about reforming society. … The standard justification for these courses is to “open students’ minds” — an open-ended catchphrase arrogated from old panegyrics to the idea of Education itself and misapplied to the attempted destruction of students’ morality. Indeed, a key reason for the courses is the imposition of the sex profs’ own morality …
Whereas others, even other professors, would get fired and even sanctioned for devoting office time and resources to the pursuit of pornography, sex professors get paid for it. They get sent to the porn conferences to “research” and meet their favorite porn stars. And their supreme perk is being allowed to share their predilections to dozens of newly “legal” young adults every year. (Speaking of that “legal” ? one of the prime concerns of the conferences is lowering if not eliminating that limit, to open pre-teen’s minds, of course.)
