It can’t be true. Nay, I refuse to believe it! How could my beloved Chapel Hill possibly support a course whose intent it is to teach students about (among other things) the relationship between water, gender, and poverty without including sexual preference to the list?
Everyone knows that sexual preference, even more so than gender, plays a crucial role in the biological dependence of water for humans. I think it was National Geographic that printed a bio-fact a few months ago pointing out that the biological systems of homosexuals require more water than the average heterosexual. I daresay, I cannot offer even the semblance of such a fact for the relationship between gender and water.
This outrage must be addressed post-haste!
