by Dr. Terry Stoops
Former Director of the Center for Effective Education, John Locke Foundation
The Department of Education recently proposed priorities for American history and civics instruction that are inspired by critical race theory (CRT).
President of the National Association of Scholars Peter Wood and Project Director of Civics Alliance David Randall submitted a joint public comment opposing this rule. Here is the text of their superb comment:
[Re Proposed Rule “Proposed Priorities-American History and Civics Education,” Docket ID No. ED-2021-OESE-0033]
Dear Office of Elementary and Secondary Education,
We urge the Department of Education to withdraw the Proposed Rule “Proposed Priorities-American History and Civics Education,” which will replace support for teaching American history and civics with support for propaganda to impose radical ideology in American history and civics classes.
Peter Wood writes as President of the National Association of Scholars (NAS). NAS is a network of scholars and citizens united by our commitment to academic freedom, disinterested scholarship, and excellence in higher education. As part of its mission, NAS supports proper instruction in history and civics, and seeks to have government policy support history and civics education which meets the highest standards of scholarship and which disseminates the truth about why our exceptional country merits its citizens’ affection and allegiance.
David Randall writes as Project Director of the Civics Alliance. The Civics Alliance unites education reformers, policymakers, and citizens of the United States who want to preserve civics education that teaches students to take pride in what they share as Americans—an exceptional heritage of freedom, a republic that has succeeded in making liberty a fundamental principle of our government, and the joyful accomplishments of their common national culture.
The Proposed Rule relies extensively on the vocabulary of radical activists, including antiracism, bias, discriminatory, diversity, equity, identity, inclusive, information literacy, misinformation, safety, supportive, systemic racism, and validate. The Proposed Rule’s reliance on this vocabulary guarantees that radical activists will receive the lion’s share of American History and Civics Education funding. It will also coerce all applicants to forward radical activist ideology.
The Proposed Rule assumes the existence of “systemic racism” and requires applicants to “Take into account systemic marginalization.” “Systemic racism” and “systemic marginalization” do not exist: the federal government should neither endorse falsehoods nor require applicants for government grants to affirm them.
The Proposed Rule, by its reliance on the language of diversity and identity, assumes the foundational salience of identity groups. This directly undermines the purpose of civics education, which both presumes and fosters the foundational unity of individual American citizens in the American republic.
The Proposed Rule approvingly cites The New York Times’ The 1619 Project, which has been widely denounced as a radical polemic riddled with historical errors.
The Proposed Rule also approvingly cites the blatantly racist “antiracism” of Ibram X. Kendi, which has been accurately described as an ideology whose “goals are openly totalitarian.”
Any one of these flaws would be sufficient reason for the Education Department to withdraw this Proposed Rule. We urge you to withdraw this Proposed Rule immediately and entirely.
Peter Wood, President of the National Association of Scholars
David Randall, Project Director of Civics Alliance