John Daniel Davidson of the Federalist questions the Biden administration’s unqualified support of the Secret Service after the weekend’s assassination attempt.

No failure, regardless of how monumental or catastrophic, is ever so bad that President Joe Biden and his lieutenants won’t try to spin it into some kind of success. Because no Democrat will ever admit failure, there’s never any accountability when things go unimaginably bad.

Witness the spectacle of Biden’s Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on Monday defending U.S. Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle, who is facing a growing chorus of calls to resign, and declaring he has “100 percent” confidence in her and her agency in the wake of an assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump on Saturday at a rally in western Pennsylvania. 

“What you saw on stage on Saturday, with respect to individuals putting their own lives at risk for the protection of another, is exactly what the American public should see every single day,” he said — adding, in a note of absurd self-aggrandizement, “It is what I indeed do.”

The president himself, in a Monday interview with NBC News, echoed Mayorkas’ line about individual agents putting their lives on the line and then said it was an “open question” whether they did what they needed to do to prevent the assassination attempt.

But of course, they did not do what needed to be done, otherwise it wouldn’t have happened. The failure of the Secret Service in this regard is mind-boggling in its completeness. There is no way they could have failed in greater measure — except to have literally done nothing and allowed the shooter to empty his magazine at Trump. Yet the Biden administration is chalking this up to an exemplary success and claims to still have “100 percent confidence” in the Secret Service.