If you needed additional evidence for the proposition that there is something horribly wrong in the women?s studies movement, consider this op-ed in the Christian Science Monitor. Rosanna Hertz, a professor of women?s studies and sociology at Wellesley, describes why and how single women go about intentionally having babies without fathers, and how they recruit ?male role models? among teachers and relatives to substitute for dads. Here?s her explanation for the thought process going on:

Having men around isn’t just about creating positive role models. Ironically, these women also want their children to understand male privilege in American society. Women want their sons to have a foothold in the dominant culture that gives men advantages, even if they do not support that culture. They want their daughters to be exposed to it, too, in order to combat gender discrimination in the future. There’s no substitute for having men teach the lessons of living in a continuing world of patriarchy.

Bonkers. Absolutely bonkers. Perhaps the most important proposition for which this piece is evidence is that thoughtful, concerned parents, married or not, should never send their daughters to Wellesley.