In fairness, the N&R did publish two columns critical of public unions, one by Jonah Goldberg and the other by Amity Shlaes.
But the N&R also published two columns vigorously defending public workers, neither of which is posted, but you’ll get the idea from the pull quotes.
From N.C. State professor David Zonderman:
We are told that states and municipalities have a “spending problem,” not a “revenue problem.” Again, this assertion is utter nonsense without any ground in the economy today. Most states have already slashed budgets in recent years; there is no “runaway” spending unless you count paying to keep roads paved, and poor children fed and waste and fraud.
From UNCG professor Lisa Levenstein and doctoral candidate Jason Brent:
We are where we are not because of the costs of maintaining a strong public sector but because we did not collect revenue and save when we should have, and then unforeseeable bad times hit.
…The idea that public sector workers earn inflated wages is simply not true. Indeed, since World War II, one of the primary attractions of the public sector has not been its high pay but its promise of jobs security.
I find it ironic that the authors claim that state and local governments have lost 400,000 jobs since mid-2008, then turn around and note that “job security” is the major attraction of the public sector. Here in North Carolina, where both authors reside, Civitas research shows that North Carolina state government has added almost 35,000 jobs while the private sector lost 49,000 jobs.
Needless to say, the authors believe states should just raise taxes, like they did in Illinois. We’ll see how that works out. By the way, when they say “we’ did not collect revenue and ‘we’ did not save, who are they talking about?
