Want another reason to oppose the recent federal health care reform legislation? Washington Examiner online opinion editor David Freddoso offers one today:
Even Obamacare?s biggest cheerleaders won?t be able to ignore
Medicare chief actuary Richard Foster forever. Based on current law,
Foster says, seniors who rely on Medicare will replace Medicaid
recipients at the bottom of the health care ladder as early as 2019,
five years after the individual mandate kicks in. That?s when the fees
Medicare pays to providers will be slashed below Medicaid rates, which
are already well below market prices.?And if you?re in a plan that pays the lowest rates, you?re in trouble,? John Goodman, president of the National Center for Policy Analysis, told The Examiner.
That?s because the $575 billion cut to Medicare over the next decade
? which is needed to pay insurance subsidies for 32 million new people
? will force one in seven hospitals, nursing homes, home health
agencies and hospices out of business, according to the formal Medicare
trustees report released on April 22. By 2050, 40 percent of existing
health care facilities will forced to close their doors.Nearly half of the 32 million newly insured people will be enrolled
in Medicaid (those whose incomes are at or below 133 percent of the
poverty line will have no choice), but they shouldn?t expect the level
of care that current Medicaid recipients receive, Goodman adds.?For many low-income people, there?s not going to be much
difference. Now they get care at community health centers and hospital
emergency rooms. The Medicaid system won?t be able to handle them in a
substantially different way. They?ll end up going to the same doctors
and the same facilities they go to as uninsured.?But there will be one difference: The wait for care will be much, much longer.
