Low-income children, high performing schools

View in your browser.

Welcome

Since the release of grades based on the state’s new school performance grade system, the mainstream media and liberal advocacy organizations have focused on the number of low-income schools that received a D or F. If they weren’t so hell-bent on criticizing and ridiculing Republican education policies, they would celebrate the outstanding achievements of the 150 low-income public schools that earned an A or B.

Bulletin Board

• Learn. The John Locke Foundation and Carolina Journal provide unsurpassed research, analysis, reporting, and opinion on North Carolina’s most important and talked about issues.  Sign up for a Key Account to receive daily updates from our staff.
• Attend. A list of upcoming events sponsored by the John Locke Foundation can be found at the bottom of this newsletter, as well as here.  We look forward to seeing you!
• Share. The North Carolina History Project seeks contributors to the North Carolina History Project Encyclopedia. Please contact Dr. Troy Kickler for additional information./
• Revisit. We have archived all research newsletters on our website.  Access the archive here.
• Donate. If you find this newsletter mildly informative or entertaining, please consider making a tax-deductible contribution to the John Locke Foundation.  The John Locke Foundation is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization that does not accept nor seek government funding. It relies solely on the generous support from individuals, corporations, small businesses, and foundations.

CommenTerry

When the N.C. Department of Public Instruction (DPI) released school performance grades earlier this month, public school advocacy groups noted that the grades reflected the socioeconomic makeup of the schools.  They observed that schools with few free and reduced price lunch students generally received As and Bs, while schools with a majority of disadvantaged students received Ds and Fs.

While some liberal commentators used it as an opportunity to reflect on the challenges of poverty and broken families in our public schools, others speculated that the main purpose of the school performance grades was to humiliate schools that enroll a significant number of disadvantaged children.  Their ridiculous claim is built on the belief that Republicans hate poor people and despise those who claim to champion anti-poverty measures.  In this way, the "humiliation thesis" posits that school performance grades are an extension of conservatives’ intense animosity toward low-income children and their parents.

Contrary to what the radical left may say, Republicans do not hate poor people or the institutions, particularly public schools, that may lift them out of poverty.  They simply want to give taxpayers information to better evaluate investments in those institutions.  After all, it does the poor no favors to overestimate the very institutions designed to provide their children the means to realize a more prosperous future.  We know, all too well, that some public schools are not up to that task.

But some are.  A closer look at the school performance grades shows that around 150 of North Carolina’s public schools with at least half of students eligible for a free or reduced price lunch earned an A or B.  They did so by performing well on state tests and other student achievement measures, which account for 80 percent of the grade.  The remaining 20 percent of the grade took academic growth into account.  (As I wrote earlier this month, legislators may consider altering this formula to provide a system of school performance grades that compensate for demographic differences among schools and districts.)

The highest performing elementary schools in this cohort were Riverbend Elementary in Haywood County, Rutherford College Elementary in Burke County, Beaver Dam Elementary in Cumberland County, and Ocracoke School (Pre-K-12) in Hyde County.  All four schools earned As overall, and three of the four schools exceeded growth expectations on state tests.  At least 80 percent of the students in these schools were at or above grade level on state reading, math, and science tests.

The top middle school was Hendersonville Middle School in Henderson County, followed closely by Burke Middle School in Burke County.  Both schools earned Bs overall and exceeded growth expectations.  While both schools performed reasonably well in reading and science, they struggled in math.

Fourteen high schools in this cohort, including Ocracoke School, earned A grades.  Challenger Early College High in Catawba County and Jacket Academy at Carver High School in Forsyth County were among the top scoring schools in the state.  Henderson County Early College and J.D. Clement Early College High School also earned exemplary scores.

Obviously, this cursory analysis does not address the reasons why these schools were successful.  I suspect that each of these schools have outstanding teachers and administrators, supportive educational environments, and high expectations for all students.  Perhaps now that we’ve identified these superb schools, some enterprising researchers or doctoral students will identify the unique elements of their success and share their findings with schools that struggle to adequately educate disadvantaged students.

Facts and Stats

Low-income schools with a school performance grade (SPG) of A or B, 2013-2014

Note: All schools listed above serve at least 50 percent free and reduced price lunch students.

Acronym of the Week

SPG — School performance grades

Quote of the Week

"Social problems present our schools with serious challenges.  Nonetheless, schools are not helpless.  The evidence shows that there are many effective strategies for improving student performance, even — and sometimes especially — for poor minority students who bear the brunt of these challenges.  The Myth of Helplessness should not be allowed to stand in the way of reforms that promise to help those students who need it most."

– Jay Greene, Education Myths: What Special Interest Groups Want You to Believe about Our Schools — and why it Isn’t So, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2006, p. 48.

Click here for the Education Update archive.

You can unsubscribe to this and all future e-mails from the John Locke Foundation by clicking the "Manage Subscriptions" button at the top of this newsletter.