Adam Kredo of the Washington Free Beacon reports damaging new information about the Biden administration’s foreign policy.

When the Biden administration resumed funding to the United Nations relief agency for Gaza, it penned an internal memo aimed at defending UNRWA over its production of childhood “educational materials” that encourage violence and demonize Israel. Some of those materials included references to “jihad” and Israeli “occupation”—terms that the Biden State Department wrote are “in line with U.N. principles” and only “viewed as inappropriate by some other audiences.”

The memo, obtained by the Washington Free Beacon through a records request from watchdog group Protect the Public Trust, came roughly two weeks after the Biden administration restored tens of millions of dollars in funding to UNRWA in April 2021 following a pause during President Donald Trump’s first stint in the White House. Written by deputy assistant secretary Nancy Izzo Jackson for Secretary of State Antony Blinken, it addressed “examples of criticism” targeting UNRWA and laid out the State Department’s “response.” 

The first section, titled, “Educational Materials,” notes that UNRWA made “home-learning ‘cards,’ based on the Palestinian Authority’s educational curriculum, to supplement textbooks sent home” during the COVID pandemic. Some of those cards, according to a January 2021 report from research firm Impact-se, included the “encouragement of violence” and accused Israel “of deliberately dumping radioactive and toxic waste in the West Bank.” 

UNRWA, the State Department wrote, had already removed or changed the content before the report’s release. Shortly thereafter, however, Impact-se issued a follow-up report that identified additional “problematic cards,” including “references to jihad in and violence in Arabic language lessons for grades 6 and 9,” as well as references to “the Israeli occupation.” UNRWA determined that those terms did not violate “U.N. principles,” according to the State Department memo, which states that only “some other audiences” may object to them.