It’s not surprising [it’s also quite comical] that an editorial writer defending a history curriculum where events and people that had influence before 1877 are left out, places John Locke in “1700 and 1800’s” [sic].
by Locker Room contributor
It’s not surprising [it’s also quite comical] that an editorial writer defending a history curriculum where events and people that had influence before 1877 are left out, places John Locke in “1700 and 1800’s” [sic].
