I liked Paul Cwik’s talk, but would take issue with the implicit idea that it is a function of the state government to attempt to equalize economic development and prosperity among regions of the state by taking policy steps calculated to boost regions that aren’t “sharing in the prosperity” (as Hillary Clinton might put it).
Why repeal business taxes just in counties located in relatively poor areas? I’m against preferential treatment for any group, including people and businesses located in counties with low average incomes. Doing so will confer an arbitrary advantage on them just because of the happenstance of county lines.
If people in eastern NC don’t like their circumstances, I submit that it is their place to do something about it. Of course, the state should get out of their way by eliminating taxes and regulations that impede production and employment, but only part of a general program of governmental downsizing.
