Had a more detailed look at the CoA’s ruling… it does not apply to Wake County or Concord, as the General Assembly specifically defined “clear proceeds” of the cameras for those jurisdictions to be net of the money paid to a contractor to run the system. If the General Assembly can constitutionally define “clear proceeds” in that manner — an issue not before the Court of Appeals and, consequently, which it did not address — then it would be a simple matter to get the cameras back on wherever local governments fear the school system demanding a lot of money, simply by having the General Assembly extend the Wake/Concord definition to other jurisdictions.