That’s the suggestion from Cindy McCain’s lawyer after the NYT hit piece today:

It is worth noting that you have not employed your investigative assets looking into Michelle Obama. You have not tried to find Barack Obama’s drug dealer that he wrote about in his book, Dreams of My Father. Nor have you interviewed his poor relatives in Kenya and determined why Barack Obama has not rescued them. Thus, there is a terrific lack of balance here.

As Ed Driscoll notes:

[T]he mere fact that “Barack Obama’s drug dealer” is being introduced into the public discourse by a campaign surrogate itself is pretty remarkable. …

But then, given that the Tanning Bed media have made the business license of someone who merely asks a question of a candidate fair game, and now, the parenting skills of a potential first lady, they shouldn’t be surprised if the other side decides to push back.