Last week, the N & O published an article about an NC WARN report that argues solar power is less expensive than nuclear power.
I criticized the report in this detailed blog post and the N & O published my letter to the editor. Today, NC WARN responded to criticism of its report with a letter in the N & O.
NC WARN argues regarding my letter: “In its criticism, the Locke Foundation referred to 2008 federal data long eclipsed by utility reports…”
Not only does NC WARN do a disservice to the public by being misleading about solar costs, it can’t even be honest about something as simple as the data I used.
The data that I used was 2010 EIA data.
That cost data I provided was only the tip of the iceberg as to what is wrong with NC WARN’s report. My detailed blog post provides a lot more detail. Quite simply, the report is a joke.
