I admit to being confused here.
The current state policy seems to be, in the absence of proof of immigration status, we will charge you the highest rate. The bill in question would, I assume, change that to be, in the absence of proof of status, you may still qualify for the lower rate if you provide a transcript from a in-state institution.
Would there be any other proof of residency required? Would you even need to be a current resident of the state to qualify? How do other states handle this?
Like I said, I’m confused.
