My letter to the New York Times was just published. In the letter, I explain that the Supreme Court, in blocking matching funds from being distributed in Arizona, took the obvious action in light of the Davis case (which I have discussed here).
It is interesting to see how even the letter writers supporting clean elections don’t defend it, but instead point to another system that doesn’t include matching funds. Even they know that “clean elections” is dead.
If the Supreme Court has blocked matching funds in Arizona out of First Amendment concerns, why hasn’t the State Board of Elections put a moratorium on matching funds in North Carolina? Do North Carolinians have less rights than people in other states?
