John Locke Update / Research Newsletter (Archive)

Locke Spotlight report exposes flaws in pro-solar power “cost” analysis

posted on

View in your browser.

This weekly newsletter, focused on environmental issues, highlights relevant analysis done by the John Locke Foundation and other think tanks, as well as items in the news.

1. Locke Spotlight report exposes flaws in pro-solar power "cost" analysis

A Spotlight report co-written by JLF’s Daren Bakst and Carlo Stagnaro, head of Italy’s Bruno Leoni Institute, debunks a comparative cost analysis released by the left-wing anti-nuclear power group known as NC WARN (The North Carolina Waste Awareness Network). The group made the claim that solar power is less costly than nuclear power as a source of electricity. As Bakst and Stagnaro point out, the NC WARN study biases its calculations to favor solar power; NC WARN treated energy subsidies arbitrarily, including them for solar power to calculate a lower cost for consumers but ignoring subsidies with respect to nuclear power. The authors also note that the NC WARN study is completely at odds with other studies. For example, they note that "The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that new solar power costs more than three times as much as nuclear power." Yet NC WARN makes no attempt to explain the discrepancy or show why their methodology should be preferred to approach used by the widely respected and fiercely non-partisan USEIA. Here is a link to the entire study (it can also be accessed in Italian from the Bruno Leoni Institute).

2. The InterAcademy Council takes aim at IPCC

Last week the InterAcademy Council, an international organization consisting of National Academy of Scientist members from across the world, issued a report assessing the process and science guiding the reports issued by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The report was quite critical. According to the Economist magazine:

The report finds problems with the way the IPCC handles reviews of its work, the degree to which it shows fairness when considering areas that are disputed, and the way it communicates the certainty, or lack of it, wherewith it speaks. It calls for new rules on conflict of interest (or more accurately, it calls for rules — at the moment the panel has none), a new full-time leadership position and a new executive committee. Perhaps most strikingly, the report can also be read as a call for Mr [Rajendra] Pachauri to resign, though neither Mr Pachauri nor Mr Shapiro have characterized [sic] it in quite that way.

Last winter, following the Climategate scandal, it was revealed that IPCC head Pachauri stood to benefit financially if global warming alarmism was accepted and programs like cap and trade were implemented.

3. Ozone Report

For the week of Aug. 29-Sept. 4, the NC DAQ reports 4 high ozone readings registered on North Carolina monitors. From April 1 through September 4, a total of 23 weeks, North Carolina has had 100 high ozone readings (.076 ppm or above over an 8 hour period). These readings were scattered around the state over 33 out of 39 different monitors and over 22 different days. Most of the high ozone days to date have occurred in the Charlotte area and in the Triad. [Note: When an ozone alert is made through the media, it is only a prediction. Very often an ozone alert is issued but a high ozone day does not materialize. That is why we are reporting here that during certain weeks there were no actual high ozone days even though ozone alerts may have been issued and reported in the media.]

Links to recent JLF reports on ozone:

4. Today at 2 p.m.: Participate in a live discussion on the Gulf oil spill

The Foundation for Economic Education will sponsor a discussion with the editor of The Freeman, Sheldon Richman, on this summer’s oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Sheldon will discuss free energy markets and the perverse incentive structure that currently exists. It will be an online discussion that is open to the public. For more information, go to


In June 2019 Roy Cordato retired from his full time position as Senior Economist and Resident Scholar at the John Locke Foundation and currently holds the position of Senior Economist Emeritus at the Foundation. From January 2001 to March 2017,… ...

Donate Today

About John Locke Foundation

We are North Carolina’s Most Trusted and Influential Source of Common Sense. The John Locke Foundation was created in 1990 as an independent, nonprofit think tank that would work “for truth, for freedom, and for the future of North Carolina.” The Foundation is named for John Locke (1632-1704), an English philosopher whose writings inspired Thomas Jefferson and the other Founders.

The John Locke Foundation is a 501(c)(3) research institute and is funded solely from voluntary contributions from individuals, corporations, and charitable foundations.