Description: To support the existing eleven (11) and coordinate an additional 19 school partnership programs between K-12 schools in Jiangsu Province and North Carolina, strengthen knowledge and understanding of China and its cultures among K-12 educational leaders, educator and students in North Carolina, facilitate dialogue and collaboration between SBE and JPDE and, coordinate periodic reporting on the MOU between SBE and JPDE to the SBE, including highlights of school programs.
The Charlotte city council rushes headlong into the 19th century. Not satisfied with subsidizing light rail commuters to the tune of $40 per round trip, the city council, enticed by a $25 million federal grant, is spending $12 million and $1.5 million annually for a streetcar. Yes, you heard it right, a 19th century streetcar to solve Charlotte's congestion problem. Another train to nowhere. And I thought Charlotte was having money problems in this recession? You just cannot make up this stuff. Raleigh taxpayers you are next. Read about it here.
I was catching up on health care blogs last night and noticed a theme on
the Left: they have changed their arguments and justifications for
ObamaCare and RomneyCare in the past few months.
Jonathan Gruber now claims the point of RomneyCare was not to reduce cost, even though cost
reduction was a big selling point for it and its ObamaCare progeny.
Ezra Klein praises the Cadillac Tax on high-value insurance plans for "falling particularly heavily on union plans and striking a serious (and, over time, larger and larger) blow against the employer-based health-care system." As
with Gruber's statement, this is true but President Obama sold his plan as protecting employer-sponsored insurance against those of us who think individuals should control their health insurance like they do their car insurance, life insurance, and homeowners insurance.
Jonathan Chait got in on the act, too, but extended the delusion to include the stimulus
First of all, the stimulus is temporary. And the spending surge is scheduled to largely recede:
I realize that conservatives believe that the stimulus will "really" be a
permanent addition to the spending baseline. I have yet to see this
explanation account for the mechanics of how Congress will add the
stimulus to the regular budget, especially with the constraints of
pay-as-you-go financing. It's simply a variant of free-floating
quasi-paranoid anti-government animus.
Actually, in North Carolina,
it is the big government supporters who act as though they believe the
stimulus will be permanent. How else can we explain a budget that spends $1.6 billion in stimulus money on continuing obligations?
And it seems everyone on the Left has dropped the "Patient Protection" part of the bill title and call it simply the
Affordable Care Act (ACA), again making it clear that their goal is to
provide subsidies, ration care through government, take away patient
choices, and not worry about patients: read you and me.
The good news is there is a new diagram to help you understand how ObamaCare will make your life simpler.
Wireless Generation, which has ties to "forever governor" Jim Hunt, obtained a $37,000 contract (state funds) from the State Board of Education to provide four days of teacher training. WG has a contract with the state to provide the software used in hand-held devices.
The company has been very active in North Carolina.
Piedmont Publius Sam Hieb notes that Sen. Kay Hagan voted for cloture on a Senate appropriations bill including a provision with a mandate forcing states to allow collective bargaining with unions representing police, firefighters, EMS workers, and other public safety employees.
North Carolina has outlawed unionization of public safety workers for more than half a century. Hagan has been all over the map on this provision, most recently stating on May 25 (through a spokeswoman — see comments) that she would NOT vote for cloture on the standalone version of the collective bargaining bill.
North Carolinians will have to decide whether the freshman Democrat gets a pass for abandoning her earlier pledge, even though the cloture vote is for a much more expansive piece of legislation.
Read Donna Martinez's CJ exclusive on the standalone collective bargaining bill here.
Carolina Journalreported last month on Susan Kerner-Hoeg's departure from the Citizen-Soldier Support Program. She was criticized for racking up extensive commuting costs traveling between Washington, D.C., and Chapel Hill.
In a press release announcing that Kerner-Hoeg was leaving, CSSP addresses the criticism:
Recent criticism of the program fails to acknowledge the great work that Susan has done for the program and that when she was hired, it was a conscious and cost effective decision of the program that she remain in Virginia and commute to Chapel Hill as required. Her responsibilities were principally in the Washington, D.C area and the commuting costs from Chapel Hill to Washington, D.C. would ultimately be much higher.
Her impact on the program has been profound and countless Service Members and their families have benefited from her dedication to the cause of mobilizing community involvement, increasing community capacity in and access to service delivery systems; she will be sorely missed.
That's the title of Daniel Henninger's WSJ column today. Excellent reading.
Henninger nails down the difference between two visions. Under the Obama/statist vision, taxes must constantly be increased, especially on business and "the rich." It's the "We work, they decide" approach, "they" meaning politicians.
On the other hand, many people prefer a tax system "that keeps more of the nation's decisions about using its wealth in the hands -- and minds -- of millions of intelligent citizens, from any economic class. They work, they decide."
Put it this way. The lower tax rates, the more that individuals get to choose how to spend or invest money. The higher tax rates, the more politicians get to choose how to spend or invest money. Well, take out "invest" from the last sentence. Politicians never really invest money, despite the chatter about how their spending on education, health care, etc is really an "investment." High taxes cut down on true investment and transfer spending decisions from individuals (who tend to carefully weigh costs and benefits) to politicians who are driven by short-run electoral considerations and special interest pressures.
Robeson County commissioners have already raised taxes $1.2 million for fiscal year 2011. Now county commissioners want to add another $1.1 million tax hike in a vote next Tuesday, August 3. But county commissioners are selling it to taxpayers as a property tax cut.
How does the sales pitch work?
Commissioners say (promise is too strong a word) they'll give back the earlier property tax hike, $0.02 per $100 valuation, if voters approve a quarter-cent sales tax hike that raises the equivalent of $0.04 in the property tax rate. John Hood has written before on how this disingenuous strategy has worked in other counties. We have a fuller analysis of the Robeson vote available, too.
Now Guilford County commissioners are warning they may seek a sales tax hike without a partially offsetting property tax cut. Commissioners there tried to get the tax hike in conjunction with bonds voters approved in 2008. So there's no sleight-of-hand there. But this quote from Commissioner Carolyn Coleman is stunning: "[T]he sentiment I’ve heard from people is they would prefer a sales tax increase over property tax. Many people who have property but are on a fixed income would be more affected by having to pay a big lump sum.” So she thinks people can afford to pay $8.00 on every $100 they spend but doesn't think the county can find a way to offer installment plans for property taxes?
Supporters of Wake County's recently discarded forced busing policy argued that the policy had led to benefits for student performance.
The latest ABCs of Public Education report will tell a different story, as Terry Stoops explains here. In summary, Wake's test score growth for 2009-10 lagged behind the growth in most of North Carolina's other large urban districts.
Terry discusses his findings in the video clip below.
For the better part of a week, Washington has been consumed by the Shirley Sherrod pseudo-scandal, leading many pundits to ponder race relations in America circa 2010. A better indicator, however, might be the goings-on in Wake County, North Carolina, where civil rights advocates are angrily protesting the decision of a newly elected school board to end the education system’s long-running busing program.
This story has it all: civil disobedience, allegations of “carpet-bagging” Yankees, super-charged emotions, and the highest of stakes: our children. Unlike the Sherrod dispute, which is mostly a symbolic proxy war, this one is fundamental to our self-definition as a country. Do we believe in raising our children together, with kids of other races, cultures, and economic backgrounds, or not?
[snip]
A new Education Next forum titled “Is Desegregation Dead?” sheds light on this question. Susan Eaton of Harvard Law squares off against Steven Rivkin of Amherst College. Though they differ in their interpretation of the “success” (or not) of desegregation, they agree on the fundamentals: Integration helps to raise minority student achievement, but it’s not nearly a strong enough intervention by itself to close achievement gaps.
John Kerry has now realized that living in the People's Republic of Massachusetts means you have to pay the taxes of the People's Republic of Massachusetts — and millionaire/billionaire ketchup dynasties are no exception.
From The Boston Globe:
Senator John F. Kerry announced yesterday that he will voluntarily pay $500,000 to Massachusetts tax collectors on his luxury yacht, a pledge made hours after state officials had begun inquiring into whether he had attempted to evade the payment by docking the boat in Rhode Island.
The state Department of Revenue had just started looking into Kerry’s use of the $7 million sloop and into reports that it had been spotted repeatedly in Massachusetts since it was registered in March. Officials could have subpoenaed the ship’s log to see where the yacht had been, according to a Department of Revenue official who declined to be identified by name because tax cases by law are confidential.
It could have been so. Seven-year terms were included in the original draft of the Constitution, but at the Constitutional Convention, Hugh Williamson of North Carolina suggested six year terms. His reasoning was that six years "was more convenient for Rotation." After some disagreement and questioning, the delegates agreed to Williamson's suggestion.
Under the Dome reports the comical/embarrasing/scandalous story of the Kill Devil Hills town clerk distributing information about a fundraiser for Senate Pro Tem Marc Basnight using the town's tax-funded e-mail server.
It was all an innocent mistake, Mary Quidley told the N&O's Ben Niolet.
"I did it because I figured it was something our citizens might want to know about not thinking that I was supporting the campaign," Quidley said.
The latest Carolina Journal Online exclusive features David Bass' report about a federal appeals court ruling against North Carolina in an air-pollution dispute with the Tennessee Valley Authority.
Civitas has an interesting poll out showing bi-partisan opposition to banning Jesus' name from invocations in the state House:
Both Democratic and Republican voters in North Carolina disagree with the policy forbidding guest chaplains in the state House from mentioning Jesus in the opening prayer session according to a new poll released today by the Civitas Institute.
According to the live caller poll of 600 likely voters, 70 percent of voters said they disagree with the policy that forbids chaplains from mentioning Jesus in their prayer. Twenty-seven percent of voters said they agree, and three percent said they are not sure.
Republicans oppose the guidelines by a 74 percent-24 percent margin. Democrats also disagree with a 70 percent-26 percent margin in opposition. Moreover, unaffiliated voters also oppose the policy by 61 percent-31 percent.
Don't miss the interviews at Watkins Grill in the WRAL report. Too bad Troy and Michael Moore were not there to explain how thinking is really hard work.
North Carolinians spend more time watching TV, relaxing and thinking than residents in most other states, according to a BusinessWeek study released on Tuesday that ranks the Tar Heel state the fourth laziest, behind Louisiana, Mississippi and Arkansas.
Residents on average each day spend eight hours sleeping, nearly three hours watching TV, about 25 minutes thinking and nearly an hour socializing, according to the study. The average North Carolinian, aged 15 and older, spends nearly three hours working.
I don't agree with the categories here. How is "thinking" lazy? We could use a lot more of that in North Carolina and the country as a whole. And getting an average of eight hours each night is healthy, not lazy.
Today's lead WSJ op-ed piece by Democratic pollsters Pat Caddell and Douglas Schoen argues that Obama has proved to be the very opposite of the "post-partisan" so many Americans thought they were voting for.
Maybe they are surprised, but I'm not. A "community organizer" steeped in leftist economic fantasies and group resentment could scarcely be expected to adopt a sensible approach to the presidency -- one that depoliticizes the nation. Instead, Obama has turned up the heat on the burners as far as they can go.
Though he's less explicit about the issue than some other observers, Newsweek's Robert J. Samuelson highlights in his latest column the impact of economic uncertainty on the current American economy:
The rebound in profits ought to be a good omen. It
frees companies to be more aggressive. They’re sitting on huge cash
reserves: a record $838 billion for industrial companies in the Standard
& Poor’s 500 Index (companies like Apple, Boeing, and Caterpillar)
at the end of March, up 26 percent from a year earlier. “They have the
wherewithal to do whatever they want—hire, make new investments, raise
dividends, do mergers and acquisitions,” says S&P’s Howard
Silver-blatt. Historically, higher profits lead to higher employment,
says Mark Zandi of Moody’s Economy.com. Except for startups, loss-making
companies don’t generate new jobs.
So far, history be damned. The contrast between
revived profits and stunted job growth is stunning. From late 2007 to
late 2009, payroll employment dropped nearly 8.4 million. Since then,
the economy has recovered a scant 11 percent of those lost jobs.
Samuelson examines the role of executive stock options, unions, imports, and immigrants as factors contributing to the lagging job growth.
In a throwaway reference, though, Samuelson names another factor that's undoubtedly playing a role.
But it’s unclear whether corporate elites were so traumatized by the
crisis that they’ve adopted a bunker mentality. That, as much as
uncertainty over Obama’s policies, is fearsome.
As a left-of-center columnist, even by Newsweek's standards, Jacob Weisberg is not the sort of writer you'd expect to raise much fuss about the latest half-baked political statements from celebrities such as Meg Ryan and Elvis Costello.
But because those two stars' latest actions involve a cultural boycott of Israel, Weisberg does take note and responds.
The stronger case against a cultural boycott of Israel is based on
consistency, proportionality, and history. That supporters of this
boycott seldom focus on China or Syria or Zimbabwe—or other genuinely
illegitimate regimes that systematically violate human
rights—underscores their bad faith. Boycotters are not trying to send
the specific message, “We object to your settlement policy in the West
Bank.” What they’re saying is, “We consider your country so
intrinsically reprehensible that we are going to treat all of your
citizens as pariahs.” Like the older Arab economic boycott of Israel,
which dates back to the 1940s, the cultural boycott is a weapon designed
not to bring peace but to undermine the country.
AYP Status – A federal measure that determines how subgroups (e.g., race/ethnicity, sex, disability, and socioeconomic status) performed on state tests. For a school to make Adequately Yearly Progress (AYP), all subgroups in the school must score proficient on state tests.
Guilford: 69 schools out of 116 (59.5%)
Charlotte-Mecklenburg: 97 schools out of 168 (57.7%)
Winston-Salem/Forsyth: 44 schools out of 81 (54.3%)
Wake: 61 schools out of 159 (38.4%)
Durham: 13 schools out of 52 (25.0%)
Michael Barone's latest article for the Washington Examiner dissects Democrats' spin about the fall elections.
[T]his Democratic spin sounds a lot like the Republican spin back in the 2006 cycle. If the numbers don't change too much from 2004, Republicans said then, we can hold on. If the numbers don't change too much from 2008, Democrats think now, they can hold on.
But the Republicans, as George W. Bush said, took "a thumping" in 2006. And most signs suggest Democrats will take a thumping this year too.
To see why, take a look at the generic ballot question -- which party's candidate will you vote for in elections to the House? The current realclearpolitics.com average shows Republicans ahead by 45 to 41 percent. Ten of this month's 15 opinion polls asking the question had Republicans ahead; Democrats led in four (twice by 1 percent), and one poll showed a tie.
Keep in mind that the generic ballot question historically has tended to underpredict Republican performance in off-year elections. Gallup has been asking the question since 1950 and has shown Republicans leading only in two cycles, 1994 and 2002, and then by less than the 7 and 5 points by which they won the popular vote for the House in those years.
So the Republicans' current lead in the generic ballot question suggests they may be on the brink of doing better than in any election since 1946, when they won a 245-188 margin in the House -- larger than any they've held ever since.
The latest Carolina Journal Online exclusive features Sarah Okeson's report on the impact of new Build America Bonds on local school and government debt.
John Hood's Daily Journal explains the senselessness of spending taxpayer dollars on high-speed rail and a Charlotte streetcar line.
Anthony Greco's latest video report is on the rollout of a proposal to run a multibillion-dollar high-speed rail line from Charlotte to Washington, D.C. Watch Anthony's exclusive here.
Now if he could just apply the lesson instead of fleecing his fellow citizens for all they're worth in the name of ever bigger, ever more intrusive government.
Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank caused a scene when he demanded a $1 senior discount on his ferry fare to Fire Island's popular gay haunt, The Pines, last Friday. Frank was turned down by ticket clerks at the dock in Sayville because he didn't have the required Suffolk County Senior Citizens ID. A witness reports, "Frank made such a drama over the senior rate that I contemplated offering him the dollar to cool down the situation."
A federal appeals court has unanimously overturned a district court decision in favor of North Carolina’s clean-air lawsuit against the Tennessee Valley Authority. The judges concluded, properly, that allowing a state to pursue dubious claims of environmental harm against a utility in another state encroaches on federal regulatory authority and could cause significant problems with uncertainty and fairness.
The John Locke Foundation has long questioned the factual and legal basis for Attorney General Roy Cooper’s lawsuit against the TVA. For example, a 2008 report by Roy Cordato and Joel Schwartz took a critical look at Cooper's assertions about the costs and benefits of the proposed emissions rules, concluding that “the actual benefits of the TVA power plant emission reductions will at
best be only a tiny fraction of the amount claimed by the Attorney
General’s experts.”
Carolina Journal has followed the case closely, as well, reporting in 2009 about a draft report that the state’s Division of Air Quality scrapped after realizing that it undercut Cooper's case.
Check Carolina Journal Online tomorrow morning for a David Bass report on the appeals court decision.
Minutes ago, Arne Duncan announced that North Carolina is a finalist for Race to the Top money, round 2. This time around, 35 states and D.C. applied for a piece of the $3.4 billion pie.
"Legalize It 2010 featuring Slightly Stoopid" will be at the Raleigh Amphitheatre tomorrow. Cypress Hill and Collie Buddz will also perform.
Here is what the News & Observer wrote about the Legalize It 2010 tour earlier this year:
When city leaders hatched their plans to build an amphitheater across the street from the new convention center, this probably wasn't what they were thinking. Through an agreement with the city, Live Nation, the nation's biggest concert promoter, books shows at the new site.
Cypress Hill's song "Hits From the Bong" features these lyrics: "Inhale, exhale - just got an ounce in the mail. I like a blunt or a big fat cone, but my double-barrel bong is getting me stoned."
I assume that the playlist will include "Hits From the Bong," as well as other tunes musing on marijuana use and Cheech and Chong.
In this Cato Institute speech honoring Milton Friedman, George Will says that we aren't.
It's a terrific speech, but the reason for all the turmoil in the country over the last several years (actually much longer) is that there is a large segment of the population that is entirely "state-broken" -- people who look to government to give them what they want and solve all the problems they perceive. Those people, exemplified by the likes of Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Dodd, and so many others, just won't leave the unbroken alone. They insist on not only taking away what is left of the liberty and property of those who prefer freedom, but wish to destroy their spirit by calling them nasty names and silencing their unwanted dissent from the statist orthodoxy.
Roy Cordato warned us recently against referring to President Obama as “anti-business.” Roy says it’s more accurate to label our president “anti-free market, anti-personal liberty, and anti-entrepreneurship.”
Ramesh Ponnuru tackles a similar theme in the latest National Review, urging Republicans to support policies that emphasize market competition, rather than policies that promote particular existing businesses.
”The problem we have had as a party is we have often confused being pro-market with being pro-business,” says Rep. Paul Ryan (R., Wis.) When businesses ask for earmarks, too many of his colleagues think that saying yes is the right thing to do. Ryan believes that Republicans should run against “crony capitalism,” in which government selects some firms for favors.
Ponnuru returns to the theme near the article:
A lot of Republicans are convinced that the free-enterprise system needs a more vigorous defense than it has needed in many years. Defending it requires first defining what it is — and what it is not. A welfare system for business is not, and tends to discredit, free enterprise. Supporters of markets must be zealous not only in protecting business from government but in protecting citizens from their improper combination.
The latest dead-tree version of National Review features a John J. Miller article on the “crop of Afghan and Iraq War vets” who will help Republicans battle for control of the U.S. House of Representatives in the fall elections.
The first candidate mentioned — and the only one pictured — is Ilario Pantano, who’s seeking to unseat North Carolina 7th District Democrat Mike McIntyre.
Wilmington-area John Locke Foundation supporters might remember Pantano’s 2006 Headliner presentation on his book Warlord.
Here’s an early paragraph from Miller’s new article:
Today, Pantano is one of the GOP’s great hopes for wresting control of the House away from Democrats. North Carolina’s 7th district, which includes Wilmington and its environs, prefers Republican presidential candidates. John McCain took it with 52 percent and George W. Bush took it with more. Since 1996, however, the area’s voters have sent blue-dog Democrat Mike McIntyre to Washington, often with commanding majorities against token opposition. Pantano insists that he’ll deliver a different result in 2010: “When I saw that Scott Brown could win a Senate race in Massachusetts, I knew I could win here.”
The latest Carolina Journal Online exclusive features Hal Young's profile of Rod Helder, the man who's retiring after 25 years of overseeing private and home education for state government.
John Hood's Daily Journal encourages Gov. Beverly Perdue to follow up on the idea of selling off North Carolina's state-owned liquor stores, along with other low-performing assets.